<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nathanbierma.com archive &#187; in &#8216;Eclectic Encyclopedia&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/category/onlanguage/inbook/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com</link>
	<description>archive prototype</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8216;Meta&#8217;-morphosis: It&#8217;s everywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/91</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/91#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 20:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Helma Dik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metaphysics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prefixes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prepositions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too much meta. That&#8217;s what Sam McManis wrote earlier this year in the Sacramento Bee, talking about the just-released movie &#8220;Tristram Shandy: A Cock and Bull Story.&#8221; The movie is &#8220;a movie about making a movie of an 18th Century comic novel that was about the conventions of novel writing,&#8221; McManis explained.
&#8220;How very meta it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/91/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Co-&#8217; offers an alternative for families that are in &#8217;step&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/150</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/150#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cinderella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gypsy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heathen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeannie McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Pickett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathy McGrath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prefixes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remarriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[step-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Glowka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 10 years ago, sisters Kathy McGrath and Jeannie McDonald encountered a dilemma when introducing the members of their new stepfamily.
&#8220;We found ourselves dealing with awkward situations when introducing someone: `This is my dad&#8217;s wife,&#8217;&#8221; McGrath said. &#8220;There was always a hesitation in our voice. Saying `stepmother&#8217; and `stepson&#8217; never seemed to convey the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/150/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite White House theme, days numbered for &#8216;merry&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/14</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Holidays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merry Christmas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[word histories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[words]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The White House theme gave a boost to a word that has been lagging lately in the English language: "merry." As with our Christmas ornaments, we pick "merry" out of our closets this time of year, blow the dust off it, and put it on prominent display in anticipation of Dec. 25. After that, we put it back in a box and keep it in storage for the next 11 months.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/14/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentence diagramming finds way back into some hearts</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/31</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/31#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 20:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Mulroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagramming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gertrude Stein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitty Burns Florey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence diagramming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentence parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sentences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syntax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sentence diagramming is the long division of English. It involves a bewildering array of lines and diagonal branches. It is loathed as an elementary school chore. And it is presumed to be obsolete.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/31/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enjoy reading and writing? You have alphabet to thank</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/186</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/186#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Sacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hieroglyphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would you say was the most influential invention in human history? The wheel? The light bulb?
How about the alphabet?
We tend to take it for granted, but the alphabet was a human invention. Without it, we wouldn&#8217;t read books and newspapers or write shopping lists and e-mails. We would have to rely on recitations and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/186/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newscasters speaking in &#8216;-ing&#8217; are creating a tense situation</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/26</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/26#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[absolute phrases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geoffrey Nunberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Vanden Bosch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newscasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Brokaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Milk sales are up, reported NBC's Peter Alexander last month on &#34;Nightly News.&#34; What Alexander said was this: &#34;America's favorite drink at home now becoming a popular choice for families on the go.&#34; Not &#34;is becoming,&#34; but &#34;now becoming.&#34; This strange syntax is getting more common on television news.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/26/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political words for bigwigs and fat cats</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/173</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/173#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grant Barrett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political language is often stuffy and dull, but it can also be clever, creative and cruel. Here are some of the cliches and coinages that have spiced up American politics, from the new book &#8220;Hatchet Jobs and Hardball: The Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang&#8221; (Oxford, $25) by lexicographer Grant Barrett.



$(document).ready(function(){ $('#bookad').load('/includes/bookads/173.html'); });


also-ran: from horse [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/173/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slogan puts Bulls in the thick of it</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/10</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/10#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canterbury Tales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chaucer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Bulls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phrases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slogans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chicago Bulls' slogan for their current season-ticket campaign is "Through Thick and Thin!"]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/10/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact or fiction? &#8216;Solecism&#8217; history sounds Greek to me</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/162</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/162#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anakreon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancient Greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia Minor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Athens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[etymology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liddell and Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merriam-Webster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Spelling Bee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perseus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solecism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soloi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Word of the Day that turned up in my e-mail inbox was &#8220;solecism,&#8221; meaning a breach of grammar or etiquette. It comes from the Greek word &#8220;soloikismos,&#8221; for &#8220;speaking incorrectly.&#8221;
I learned this from Merriam-Webster&#8217;s free service for word buffs; you can sign up at www.m-w.com, but I warn you, it launches endless etymological expeditions.
Here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/162/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At the end of the day, &#8216;back in the day&#8217; just means &#8216;past&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/5</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Bierma</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in 'Eclectic Encyclopedia']]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phrases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanbierma.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN anchor Soledad O'Brien once owned a lavender Citroen, she recalled on the air June 10.

"Wow! That was back in the day," her guest remarked.

"That was so back in the day it's not even funny," O'Brien replied. "I don't want to talk about it anymore."

Which "day" we are talking about is not always clear, but there has been a lot of going back to it lately.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanbierma.com/archive/5/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- www.000webhost.com Analytics Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php"></script>
<noscript><a href="http://www.hosting24.com/"><img src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php" alt="web hosting" /></a></noscript>
<!-- End Of Analytics Code -->
